light sensor & colorimeter
Often used elaborately to produce a makeshift colorimeter, the light is very useful for many biology and chemistry experiments on rates of reactions. As monochromatic light is less important with turbid solutions the makeshift colorimeter seems adequate for measuring the speed of precipitation reactions. Some have a linear response that suits them better to quantitative work such as showing the inverse square ‘law’, some have a logarithmic response which is perfectly adequate for other, more general uses. For example, you could use almost any light sensor device as a marker sensor to show day and night. They vary in their response, for example an LDR type responds more slowly than a diode type. The faster type can pick up the AC ripple from a fluorescent tube – which can be a source of interference to the sensor in normal use. Makes also vary in their spectral response – something to consider when you compare the brightness of different coloured fabrics. Curiously, some respond well to infra-red and can pick up the signal from a remote control. Variously calibrated as %, Watt/m² or lux. My rating was *** / +++
I’ve rated these sensors but your assessment will be different. I give * to **** for the sensor’s intrigue, interest, and learning potential. I give from + to ++++ for how often a science department might use it.
Rare but very useful for quantitative work in biology and chemistry experiments where a rate of a reaction is measured. Bleaching food dye, the iodine-propanone reaction and the action of pepsin on milk are some examples. Monochromatic light is very important in colorimetry, so this ‘sensor’ will come with a few filters. Main advantage is one of convenience over making your own colorimeter with a light probe. My rating was *** / ++
Might be used for measuring radiant heat or the heat from different surfaces. There are still too few reports of curriculum applications where infrared changes in relation to time or some other variable. However there ought to be lots of uses to measure heat loss / heat flow but we never did them because the sensor was rare. My rating was ** / +